Being made president the three cuts i would mare would be in the following areas, taxes, Government spending and cut unnecessary ministries or departments.
The fist big cut I would make would be tax cuts, the reason for this is the less taxes are charged on the populaiton the more money said population will have to spend on goods and services adn thus circulate in the economy. This would also mean less tax breaks for the wealthly, thus removing their privileges of avoiding taxes through charities.
The second big cut I would make would be in government spending, or more specifically reducing or cutting the salaries of career politicians by 30% to 40%. This is becasue the government with is the largest spender of capital in any given country while being the lowest producer of capital and it is unsustainable to maintain large political salaries. With this cut it would not only alleviate the tax payer, but also free up remaining funds for health and educaiton.
Finally the last cuts I would make would be in the area of departments or ministries. While some such as the department of Agriculture and Interior incompatible and cannot be fused, other such as the departmetn of labour and Treasury can be fused, reducing the number of departments and thus overall government spending again.
These are the three be cuts I would make as President.
I chose to make cuts to income security, education, and health spending. I needed to make cuts to programs that were receiving the largest amounts of federal funding. These cuts were necessary to meet the president's budgetary promises.
Hate crime law: The term "hate crime law" is determined as a law that is being intended to discourage "bias-motivated violence". Therefore, hate crime laws are considered as different from that of hate speech laws, however, it enhances the various penalties that are being connected with conduct that has already been considered as criminal under some other laws.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the hate crime law.