<span>An outstanding check is a check issued by the payor
and released to the payee that remains to be undeposited or uncashed check at a
certain financial period. When reconciling the bank statements with company
books, an outstanding check is deducted from the unadjusted bank balance to
arrive at the adjusted bank balance. </span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Putting the wrong wires together and not knowing what goes to what
Thomas Robert Malthus is the economist who supported it the most
The question is incomplete. However, it is about the calculation of after-tax cost of payment
Answer:
After-tax cost = payment*(1-0.37)
Explanation:
The after-tax cost is the net cost after the deduction of the amount of tax from the actual payment. In most cases, the value of the tax deduction is determined by multiplying the marginal tax rate with the payment. Then, the magnitude of the after-tax cost can be estimated by subtracting the payment from the tax deduction.
