Answer:
No. A Police Chief should not promote an Officer with special skills to a supervisory position.
Explanation:
There is a rule for succession. A Police Officer must have served a certain time in rank, and pass a test to be considered. Anything outside of this would have needed to be approved by a higher level of government or it could be seen as preferential treatment which is an ethics violation. Police officers usually become eligible for promotion after a probationary period.
To be a police officers you have to follow a special code of conduct and behavior, making it much different from other professions. The job of a police officer requires much mental toughness, physical fitness, and a level of ethics and morals not every individuals have. In order to for an officer to be promoted into a supervisory position, I feel that the officers up for advancement needs to be able to show a good track record of conduct and behaviors. I feel this can only be achieved through time spent “in rank”
If Pamela appeals the case in order to include the witness who saw Darin driving, it is possible that the appeals court will not take the witness's testimony into account.
<h3>What happens if Pamela appeals?</h3>
Appeals courts are not there to retry a case or to give the case a new trial. Their purpose is to check if there were errors in the way the lower court handled the case.
This means that they often do not take new witness testimony into account. What this means for Pamela is that even though she has a new witness, the appeals court might not consider the testimony of the witness because they were not used in the first court.
Find out more on the appeals process at brainly.com/question/1897528
#SPJ1
Answer:
if I were juror in murder case, the I would conduct all the scientific evidence, and if it still conflicts with ALL the witnesses I would not believe the witnesses. but I still would not announce my decision. I would want more evidences and proofs to announce my decision because I just can't rely only on scientific evidence, (what if the person who murdered changed the fingerprints and other scientific evidence, you never know)
Answer:
A: the total amount it will cover I think
Answer:
a run down neighbourhood
Explanation:
this theory is based on disordered areas, which will be more likely to have higher crime rates than affluent neighbourhoods.
