No, they did state that there are no warranties on the box. This means that there was a printed warning, and even if their product is of poor quality, they are not liable.
Hazirah can legally claim the remaining balance of Intan's debt because there was no acceptance of the offer from Johan that the part-payment should serve as full settlement.
<h3>What is the law of contract?</h3>
The law of contract deals with the enforcement of promises when certain elements are present. These contract elements include offer, acceptance, consideration, and intention.
Intan should remember that a valid and enforceable contract has conditions. We cannot claim there is an implied acceptance of Johan's offer. Johan cannot modify the contract terms between Intan and Hazirah because he was not a party to the contract.
Lastly, Johan did not offer any consideration for Hazirah to forfeit the balance of RM5,000. And Hazirah remained silent during Johan's informal negotiations without communicating her acceptance.
Thus, there was <u>no </u><u>contract</u><u> </u>between Johan and Hazirah, and Intan should do well to repay the balance.
Learn more about the elements of a contract at brainly.com/question/8116487
Principals in the second degree is a person who did not actually did any crime himself but he help the person who did the crime
<h3>What does principal of second degree mean?</h3>
A person who was present with the first degree person and assist him in the crime.
An accessory, who involves in the crime, that person will also be equally guilty as the first degree person would be.
Both will be consider as important principal in the case of the crime.
Learn more about the principal of the second degree here:-
brainly.com/question/4436337
#SPJ1
