A group of careers that share common features.
Hi :)
Population is a group of organisms of one one species, living in the same area at the same time
Hope this helps!
Frances must stand by his ethical standards and defer his plans to market the product.
Explanation:
Frances is stranded amidst classic case of an ethical dilemma. The ethical dilemma is an ethical perspective which puts a person in a state of to do or not. This is common and everyone undergoes through this phase for more than once in his/her lifetime.
The dilemma arises due to the substantiative profits that he can earn from marketing the product and his ethical concerns that the product is harmful for a section of the user. He needs to stick to his ethical standards and put the products to more rigorous tests and research. This would enable him to market his products in the future with some twitches and upholding his ethical concerns too.
Answer:
the monitor role
Explanation:
As stated by Henry Mintzberg, managerial roles can be divided into three basic categories:
- informational roles: includes monitor, disseminator and spokesperson roles.
- interpersonal roles: includes figurehead, leader and liaison roles.
- decisional roles: includes the entrepreneur, disturbance-handler, resource-allocator and negotiator roles.
The monitor role requires the manager to seek out information related to the organization and industry, and monitor the organization's productivity and well-being.
Sam's is liable for defamation statement is true.
<u>Option: A</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The vice president of public relations in Sam's Sandwiches issued the following false statement regarding the type of meat the Hamburger Hamlets, Inc use in there fast food products like burger. This showcase the defamation form Sam's side, which is the verbal or written transmission of a false statement about someone else that unjustly damages their image and is typically a felony or a punishment.
Diffamation law only finds defamatory claims if they are, in reality, false. A real assertion is not regarded as slander. In fact, expressions of belief are not assumed inaccurate because of their existence, since they are specific to the speaker.
