<u>Explanation:</u>
Using the Miranda v. Arizona case as an example, we need to remember that M.r Mirinda was charged with sexual assault and kidnapping; which are part of the important issues society tries to avoid
In other words, he went against these important values and goals of society. Hence, there must be a balance between the right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel over breaking other laws in the constitution.
When a product fails to perform as warranted, this is called a) contractual liability. O b) product malfunction. c) malicious manufacture. d) breach of warranty
can you heelp me ! :)
Answer:
Federal District Court
Explanation:
The first case would likely start in the Federal District Court and could be appealed to the State Supreme Court and United States Supreme Court. As seen in <em>Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. </em>the school district which suspended a girl for vulgar speech off school grounds started their case in the federal court of Middle District of Pennsylvania and eventually appealed all the way to the Supreme Court.
Edit: <em>Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. </em>did not appeal to the State Supreme Court likely because the First Amendment is a federal law and not state law.
Answer:
언론의 자유와 정부의 법률 관행 규정 사이의 갈등을 식별, 토론 및 해결
Explanation:
THERE YOU GO
