Answer:
C) The Spearman correlation results should be reported because at least one of the variables does not meet the distribution assumption required to use Pearson correlation.
Explanation:
The following multiple choice responses are provided to complete the question:
A) The Pearson correlation results should be reported because it shows a stronger correlation with a smaller p-value (more significant).
B) The Pearson correlation results should be reported because the two variables are normally distributed.
C) The Spearman correlation results should be reported because at least one of the variables does not meet the distribution assumption required to use Pearson correlation.
D) The Spearman correlation results should be reported because the p-value is closer to 0.0556.
Further Explanation:
A count variable is discrete because it consists of non-negative integers. The number of polyps variable is therefore a count variable and will most likely not be normally distributed. Normality of variables is one of the assumptions required to use Pearson correlation, however, Spearman's correlation does not rest upon an assumption of normality. Therefore, the Spearman correlation would be more appropriate to report because at least one of the variables does not meet the distribution assumption required to use Pearson correlation.
6 ft for each side, bc area is side times side, which 6x6=36
1. 3p: Add 6 to negative 3, and carry over the "p"
3. 6x: Subtract 1 from 7 and carry over the "x"
5. -4v: Add 6 to negative 10 and carry over the "v"
7. -4r + 9: Add 5 to -9 and carry over the "r". Then put "+9" after the variable, since the other 9 was by itself.
9. 14n: Add 5 to 9 and carry over the "n".
I hope this helps!
