<h3>
Answer:</h3>
The Proclamation of 1763 was a declaration made by the British government about American settlement.
What Did The Proclamation of 1763 Do?
The Proclamation stated that Americans could not settle any land to the west of the Appalachian mountains. The British government made the "proclamation line" which was a line that ran through Appalachia that showed the limit of American settlement. However, it is important to note that land west of the Appalachian had already been settled by many Americans, who believed they deserved that land. Additionally, the British government had almost no way to enforce this law.
Causes and Effects
The main cause of the proclamation was the French and Indian War. The war was very expensive for Britain, so they wanted to avoid possible future conflict.
But, during this time period, Americans had been used to a level of independence. Prior to this declaration, Britain had little interference in American politics or settlement. So, the sudden increase in government interference led to American resentment of the British. Also, the proclamation line was almost completely ignored by all Americans, which angered the British. The most direct effect of Americans ignoring the proclamation was that Britain sent troops to America to enforce British law.
The American resentment of the British people and government would eventually lead to Americans wanting independence. The Proclamation of 1763 and the Americans' reactions were one of the earliest signs of the Revolutionary War.
Answer: George Sale translates simply as The Preface, or Introduction) is the first chapter (surah) of the Quran. Its seven verses (āyah) are a prayer for the guidance, lordship and mercy of God.
...
Explanation: Stonks
Thank you and have a great nae nae
Corporate personhood is the legal notion that a corporation, separately from its associated human beings (like owners, managers, or employees), has at least some of the legal rights and responsibilities enjoyed by natural persons (physical humans).[1] In the United States and most countries, corporations have a right to enter into contracts with other parties and to sue or be sued in court in the same way as natural persons or unincorporated associations of persons. In a U.S. historical context, the phrase 'Corporate Personhood' refers to the ongoing legal debate over the extent to which rights traditionally associated with natural persons should also be afforded to corporations. A headnote issued by the Court Reporter in the 1886 Supreme Court case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. claimed to state the sense of the Court regarding the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as it applies to corporations, without the Court having actually made a decision or issued a written opinion on that point. This was the first time that the Supreme Court was reported to hold that the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause granted constitutional protections to corporations as well as to natural persons, although numerous other cases, since Dartmouth College v. Woodward in 1819, had recognized that corporations were entitled to some of the protections of the Constitution. In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (2014), the Court found that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 exempted Hobby Lobby from aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act because those aspects placed a substantial burden on the closely held company's owners' exercise of free religion.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood
I think I got the wrong answer nvm Explanation:
