It would be an "embargo" that occurs when one nation refuses all trade with another, although usually these embargo's only apply to a single group of goods, not all goods at the same time.
What is common between OSHA and SEC is : ( C ) Both create and enforce regulations
<h3>Functions of OSHA and SEC </h3>
OSHA sets/creates safety working standards which ensures safety working conditions for employees at work, this safety working standards are also enforced by OSHA through training and outreach to employers of labor. While SEC set rules which is aimed at protecting financial investors in an fairly regulated market ( stock market and other forms of financial markets ). and also enforces them.
Hence we can conclude that What is common between OSHA and SEC is : ( C ) Both create and enforce regulations
Learn more about OSHA and SEC : brainly.com/question/11819769
#SPJ1
Declare war, appoint military officers, sign treaties, make alliances
The end of the French Revolution was the overthrew of the coup d'état with Napoleon as the first consul of France. The justification for the act was the right of the government to protect the right of its people.
<h3 /><h3>What was the French Revolution?</h3>
French Revolution was the step of the change in the economy, and political and social reform in France in the eighteenth century. The revolution was ended with the first console of France.
Napoleon overthrew the directory of the Coup of 18–19 Brumaire and made himself the first console of France. The justification was made by him as he enlighten that the government had the right to protect the rights of the people. Thus, option B is correct.
Learn more about Napoleon here:
brainly.com/question/277050
No.
The Treaty of Versailles (1919) was a peace treaty signed by the European powers that officially ended World War I.
After six months of negotiations in Paris, the treaty was signed as a continuation of the November 1918 armistice in Compiègne, which had put an end to the clashes. The main point of the treaty required Germany to accept all responsibility for causing the war and, under the terms of articles 231-247, to make reparations to a number of nations of the Triple Entente.
Although the Versailles treatment was a good one, it was a way of blaming Germany and punishing it, but I don't think it's possible to say that there was peace when years later the World War II happened. They should have proposed an agreement between all countries and not just as a way of holding Germany alone.
