Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Angle m∠1 if formed by a tangent and secant intersecting outside of circle. The intercepted arcs are arc LK and arc JK.
Thus;
Angle formed by Tangent and secant
=1/2(DIFFERENCE of Intercepted Arcs)
m∠1=1/2(mJK-LK)
Answer: m∠1=1/2(mJK-KL)
Answer:
132,440
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to find out the total number of doctors, we must divide 44,500 by 33.6%. This will give you the total number of doctors from this specific data set.
Answer:
The first loan covers 80 percent of the home’s price, while the second covers the remaining 20 percent.
Step-by-step explanation:
they are still a home price percentage