Answer:
The Compromise of 1877 was an unwritten deal, informally arranged among U.S. Congressmen, that settled the intensely disputed 1876 presidential election. It resulted in the United States federal government pulling the last troops out of the South, and formally ending the Reconstruction Era.
Chesapeake colonies had rich soil and temperate climates which made large-scale plantation farming possible. The regions had an agriculture-based economy in which cash crops like tobacco, indigo, and cotton were cultivated for trade.
<h3>What was the Chesapeake's social structure like in the 1700s?</h3>
- Low life expectancy (largely due to disease), reliance on indentured servitude, weak family life, and a hierarchical structure dominated by planters at the top over masses of poor white and black slaves at the bottom characterized seventeenth-century Chesapeake society.
- The merchants, vendors, and small farmers of the colonies were the largest social class in the South and Chesapeake regions. These were ordinary citizens, moderately educated and skilled, but eager to work hard and build the America they desired.
- The Chesapeake colony of Maryland, granted by Charles I to Sir George Calvert, the first Lord Baltimore, was one of the first proprietary colonies, or colonies owned by an individual rather than a joint-stock company.
To learn more about Chesapeake bay colonies refer to
brainly.com/question/876887
#SPJ4
Black Codes. They segregated public places and it was difficult for blacks to do things.
Based on the nature of the laws, state compulsory education regulations apply to <u>Everyone</u>.
<h3>Who do these laws apply to?</h3>
Compulsory education laws imposed by the state are meant to apply to every single resident in the state.
Exemptions may exist in certain areas but these are usually on a case by case basis because the purpose of these laws is to make sure that all people have some sort of education.
In conclusion, option E is correct.
Find out more on compulsory education laws at brainly.com/question/536186.
Answer:
If pardons given to benefit himself.
Explanation:
Some presidential pardons have been controversial because these pardons are given by the president for its own profit and benefits. According to Article Two of the United States Constitution i. e. Section 2, Clause 1 says that the President shall have Power to grant pardons for Offenses against the United States but it also has some limitations. If the president pardons someone in order to benefit himself so this pardon becomes controversial.
