I’m not sure that you’d win the argument as you could possibly face repercussions of the act you did that was illegal...two wrongs won’t make a right basically.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
just because we have language barrier doesn't mean we have view someone differently
Answer: Encouraging the courts to make the right choice
Explanation:
Media coverage is beneficial in the sense that it can keep the American public informed on rulings that would fundamentally set the groundwork for future rulings. For example take the case of the State of Minnesota v. Derek Chauvin. This was a rare example of a police officer being punished for grave misdeeds.
Media coverage may put pressure on a court to make a right decision. However in some cases this can become problematic, swaying the jury one way or another and making them partial when they are to remain impartial.
Some weaknesses are the inability to control money or military, as well as not being able to act unless called for by a case. However some strengths they have are that they have the power to interpret the constitution as well as being able to shape public policy.
