1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wittaler [7]
2 years ago
15

Jesse james, a 20-year old, was arrested for killing a police officer. As a newly elected prosecutor, you are responsible for pr

osecuting mr. James. You announce your decision not to seek the death penalty in this case, but under your state?s law, the offense charged is considered special circumstances, which would qualify as a death penalty case. Your decision does not sit well with the law enforcement community. Provide an overview of the various courts in the typical state system where mr. James will appear and why he is appearing there, from arraignment to trial and the various levels of appeal. Be sure to provide specific information as it relates to any constitutional issues that may.
Law
1 answer:
Nana76 [90]2 years ago
7 0

It is important to note that various states use various metrics. In general, states adhere to some form of the federal procedural norms. States do have the freedom to take risks in the sake of justice.

<h3>What are federal procedural norms?</h3>

Civil process in United States district courts is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Rules Enabling Act requires the United States Supreme Court to promulgate the FRCP, after which the United States Congress has seven months to veto the rules or they become part of the FRCP.

<h3>Further overview on the above legal situation is as follows:</h3>

At the first stage of the "trial," the defendant must submit a plea. This is frequently followed by a first appearance or preliminary hearing, which may involve a plea if evidence is discovered.

If there are compelling reasons to proceed, a grand jury will be formed to conduct more investigations.

A grand jury must provide evidence that justifies a capital murder trial. The district attorney's office has the same authority. The defendant is then asked if he understands the charge at a pre-trial arraignment.

A plea can also be entered here at times. If the evidence merits it, a formal writ will be sent to the court, signaling the start of a trial.

Following that, pre-trial hearings are held, and witnesses may be questioned. If the defendant claims to have an alibi, he must normally produce documentation. He must describe in full where and when he was when he was exonerated from the crime.

A mental examination may be conducted in some circumstances, particularly in capital trials. There may be a demand that multiple-count trials be heard separately in order to avoid biasing the jury (guilty of the first, more likely that he is guilty of the second).

Deposits can then be made. These are largely out-of-court testimony from witnesses that will serve as the foundation for the defense or prosecution when the trial begins.

Depending on the stage, either of these processes can be considered part of the discovery process. The defendant's record is disclosed at this point, and specific objects of evidence are given over for the defendant's comprehension.

The "Pre-Trial Conference," a relatively new federal rule, is convened to agree on specific criteria throughout the trial. The goal is to speed up the trial and streamline the procedure in general.

The defendant might then request that the case be transferred to another jurisdiction.

Learn more about justice:
brainly.com/question/22967374
#SPJ4

You might be interested in
What are the consequences of illegality in relation to contract law?
Liula [17]

The general rule is this: courts will not enforce illegal bargains. The parties are left where the court found them, and no relief is granted: it's a hands-off policy. The illegal agreement is void, and that a wrongdoer has benefited to the other's detriment does not matte

hope you like the answer

An illegal agreement under the common law of contract, is one that the court will not enforce because the purpose of the agreement is to achieve an illegal end. The illegal end must result from performance of the contract itself. The classic example of such an agreement is a contract for murder.

5 0
2 years ago
If you accidently take someone's jacket, believing that it is your own, it is still larceny.
romanna [79]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

because a jacket is a person property, Similar to theft, larceny is the taking of property with the intent of depriving the owner of its use. Petty or simple larceny is usually a misdemeanor and involves theft of property less than the local threshold for grand larceny, while grand larceny is typically a felony. Examples are thefts of bicycles, thefts of motor vehicle parts and accessories, shoplifting, pocket-picking. So therefore taking someone's jacket believing is your own is still larceny.

3 0
3 years ago
(BRAINLIEST PLS HELP ME )
kvv77 [185]

Answer: Poison, sperm, lead, microbes from bodies of water, and drugs. Thats all i can think of but im sure there is alot more

8 0
3 years ago
Do you agree or disagree that the state should build roads with the help of federal funds? Is it fair for all states to give mon
vivado [14]

Answer:

Yes I agree and yes it is fair to give money to another state to build roads because it decrease power centralisation and promotes unity in action.

Explanation:

  • This directly relates to the system of checks and balances.
  • It is the system designed to reduce the effects of centralisation of power by ensuring that no single authority has complete control over decisions and promotes cooperation.
  • For Example: The tripartite system practiced in different countries where judicial, legislative and executive aspects of government has equal authorities in amending or removing the law.
  • In regard to projects like building roads other states can cooperate with one state to improve its infrastructure for equitable development.
5 0
3 years ago
Sentencing a individual to a specified period of time in jail or prison is called
Step2247 [10]

Answer:

C. Incarceration.

Explanation:

Incarceration is a legal term used to define the sentence a person receives for being in the jail  or prison.The term incarceration is derived from Latin word carcer<em> </em>which means jail. When a person commits crime, he/she gets incarcerated as a punishment. It is being in a state of imprisonment.

As per the law, policer officers or other law enforcement officers are permitted to put a person in prison who has committed any crime.

Therefore, option C is correct.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How old was president G.H.W. Bush when he was first inaugurated
    13·2 answers
  • What happens if law enforcement does not follow proper crime scene procedures?
    6·2 answers
  • Today drinking and driving is viewed as.
    7·1 answer
  • Question 11 of 1
    7·1 answer
  • Please help
    9·2 answers
  • Are the most common location for a collision between a bike and a car
    9·2 answers
  • At the crime scene, the investigator sees a bloody knife on the floor of the kitchen. What
    12·1 answer
  • When my sister does not listen to me
    8·2 answers
  • How to flirt? ... .... ....​
    13·2 answers
  • What is a designated driver?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!