If the story of "All Quiet on the Western Front" was told today, the story would be much different, especially if it was told from the viewpoint of an American soldier involved in the War on Terror. First, the protagonist would not be coming from a nation that is in a state of total war. The War on Terror is a limited war and does not require the undivided focus of the American government, industry, and economy. A soldier, today, would likely be volunteering to join the military, instead of being all but forced to like the characters in "All Quiet on the Western Front." Second, the total detachment the soldiers in "All Quiet on the Western Front" feel from their civilian lives would not be as pronounced, given how today's soldiers are able to communicate with their friends and family back home by way of email, online chat, and quicker postal service. Thirdly, today's American soldiers are provided with far better and more extensive military training than the soldiers in "All Quiet on the Western Front" are, hence they would be more prepared for the combat experiences they must endure.
We, as the people of the United States, establish the Constitution in order to<span> achieve Justice, insure domestic </span>Tranquility<span>, provide for the common </span>defence<span>, promote the general </span>Welfare<span>, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our </span><span>Posterity. </span>
Judaism and Cristianity spread around the world because Jews where kicked out of their countries to other parts of the world, and Christianity spread because of the work of their missionaries.
Answer:
government provides schools
for us and our classmates
The right answer is B. A law banning all automatic and semiautomatic firearms.
The second amendment states: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. The law is divided in two pieces. The first one is related with the need of a state security, in this case militia, to protect the security of the citizens. And the second part, is related with the inalienable right of people to keep and bear firearms, as one tools against aggressors and tyrannical government. A law imposing restrictions to the right of bear firearms would be in total opposition of the second amendment.
