Answer:
wait who is lawrence is it a problem?
The correct answer is by negotiating a peace deal
The Tet Offensive comprised of a number of surprise attacks on all major installations in South Vietnam which were carried out by the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese military. The event proved that the U.S was not winning the war and changed public opinion about the war leading the U.S to the negotiation table
The author characterize the response of the White Planters by not supporting the event.
<h3>What is White Planters?</h3>
White Planters were the social class of the United States who were socio-economic caste that were in huge number around 17th and 18th century.They were found in the agricultural markets through the slavery of African Americans.
Allen D. Candler makes every justification imaginable for the lynching of Sam Hose by the white planters, he does not truly support it.
He portrays the lynch mob as a group of guys whose patience had run out in the wake of a brutal murder.
Learn more about White Planters here:
brainly.com/question/14017448
#SPJ1
The Missouri Compromise was the laws that enacted in 1820 to maintain the balance of power between slave and free states. Henry Clay wanted Missouri (state) to be a free or a slave state but the Southerns claimed that the Constitution did not give the Congress the power to ban slavery. THey would worry that if free states formed a majority in Congress, they would ban slavery altogether. Meanwhile, Maine wanted to be part of the statehood, so Henry Clay suggested that Missouri could be a slave state and Maine as a free state but the Congress passes the Missouri Compromise so Maine became a free state and Missouri as a slave state (I think?). Among these tensions, the Mason Dixon line formed the Maryland and PA border. The line came to be used for the division between the slave states and free states, as well as the division between the north and south.(I hoped I answered your question!!)
<span>I would suggest treating the Indians in a more humane way. It's also probably better to let an Indian leader (who obeyed our colonists) rule the Indians, because the leader would know the people and better communicate with them. And the colonists could indirectly benefit instead of being in conflict with the Indians directly.</span>
