Answer:
$67.20
Step-by-step explanation:
"30% off" translates into multiplying the original price by 1.00 - 0.30, or 0.70.
0.70($96) = $67.20 is the sales price
You have a lot of questions here, try breaking them up into multiple posts and you may get more responses.
I will help with some.
<span>(x+3)=0
The solution is just -3.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
3m(m-4)=0
The two solutions are 0 and 4.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(r-3)(r+2)=0
The two solutions are and 3 and -2.
</span>
I hope this gets you started in the right direction.
Answer:
I'm not sure but if this is on a calculus paper, this may put you on the right track?
Step-by-step explanation:
definate integral from 2.3 to 2.5 would equal 3.2, i don't know what to do with that information but i hope that helps you.
The relative unfairness of an apportionment that gives a new board member to joshua rather than to salinas will be
<h3>How to calculate the values?</h3>
The relative unfairness of an apportionment that gives a new board member to joshua rather than to salinas will be:
= (1520 - 1232)/1232
= 288/1232
= 0.234
The relative unfairness of an apportionment that gives a new board member to salinas rather than to Joshua will be:
= (1448 - 1333)/1333
= 115/1333
= 0.086
The regional governing board that should receive the new board member is Salinas.
Learn more about tables on:
brainly.com/question/3632175
#SPJ1
Answer:
<em>In 5 years the product of their ages will be 208</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
The age of two children is 11 and 8 years.
Let's call x the number of years ahead.
We need to find when the product of their future ages is 208. The 11 years old child will be 11+x years old and the other child will be 8+x years, thus:
(11+x)(8+x)=208
Operating:
Simplifying:
Factoring:
(x-5)(x+24)=0
Solving:
x=5, x=-24
The negative solution is not valid, thus x=5
In 5 years the product of their ages will be 208
