Answer:
D) Both a and b.
Explanation:
COPPA means Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998, it is a federal law in the United States that became effective on April 12 2000. This law is used as pertaining to the collection of personal information of individuals under age 13. For a company that is based in US, it is required that their website must include privacy policy on how to seek parental consent, what this information will be used for, and the responsibility to protect the privacy of children online.
Most companies does not allow children under age 13 to have access to their services because of what it entails in complying with the law.
Answer:
the amount have in 25 years is $317,628
Explanation:
The computation of the amount have in 25 years is shown below:
PMT = Payment saved per year
= $3,000 + $750
= $3,750.00
N = Periods of payment = 25 years
R = Rate = 9%
Now the formula is
FV = (PMT × ((1 + R)^N-1) ÷ (R)
= $3,750 × ((1 + 9%)^25-1) ÷ (9%)
= $317,628
Hence, the amount have in 25 years is $317,628
The net income of Cookies by casey is $123,240
What is net income?
The net income of the company is the excess of its sales revenue over all costs of the running the business, which includes, the costs of sale, interest expense, depreciation as well as the taxes payable to the government authority which is 21% of profits before tax in this case.
Profit before tax=sales-costs of sale-depreciation-interest expense
sales=$487,000
costs of sale=$263,000
depreciation=$42,000
interest expense=$26,000
profit before tax=$487,000-$263,000-$42,000-$26,000
profit before tax=$156,000
tax rate=21%
net income=profit before tax*(1-tax rate)
net income=$156,000*(1-21%)
net income=$123,240
Find out more about net income on:https://brainly.ph/question/2444259
#SPJ1
Answer: d) Cannot sue Bob for misrepresentation
Explanation: A misrepresentation is a false statement made from one person to another that a certain fact is true or accurate when it is indeed false. The fact that the value of the stock I bought on Bob's opinion does not give me the right to sue him for misrepresentation (intentional). The reason is this, Bob's expression of his opinion concerning the HotNet stock does not usually constitute a misrepresentation even when it turns out that his opinion is incorrect. It wasn't intended, however, he could be sued for negligent misrepresentation.
I believe the answer is preparing a list of vegetables to purchase. That’s the only option that makes sense with his job.
