1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rufina [12.5K]
3 years ago
8

Productivity is best defined as work. A. innovation B. efficiency C.speed D. effort

Social Studies
2 answers:
kirill115 [55]3 years ago
7 0
It would be answer b, efficiency
Natalija [7]3 years ago
5 0
It would be B, efficiency
You might be interested in
What is the difference between equity and equality in society? Give an example of each. State which you believe to be more desir
Salsk061 [2.6K]
Equality is giving everyone the same amount of something. Equity is giving those who are in need more of something in order to help them be equal with others. For example, an equalist will give everyone the same amount of food regardless of their size. An equitist, on the other hand, will give food in accordance to one's size. In my opinion, both have their pros and cons.
4 0
3 years ago
A man goes to bed at his regular time, and as he begins to drift slowly off to sleep, he jumps up suddenly as he feels he is fal
oksian1 [2.3K]
Hypnagogic happens as a result of sleep deprivation, caffeine intake or stress. It usually happens during a transition between wakefulness and sleep
4 0
3 years ago
Who is the Prince of Machiavelli and what does he argue about people?
Semenov [28]

Answer:

Lorenzo de' Medici .Machiavelli defines virtues as qualities that are praised by others, such as generosity, compassion, and piety. He argues that a prince should always try to appear virtuous, but that acting virtuously for virtue's sake can prove detrimental to the principality.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What ‘policy’ did the ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford put in place?
Ede4ka [16]
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.

In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.

During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
3 0
3 years ago
According to a 1996 survey by the National Association of College and University Business Officers, more than three times as man
Serhud [2]

Answer:

(A) than those that charge

Explanation:

According to my research on correct English grammar, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the correct statement would be "than those that charge". The other statements are all grammatically incorrect and would not make sense if added to the statement in the question.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Women are more likely than men to exhibit the qualities associated with
    6·1 answer
  • _______________ is a philosophy of human dignity and worth that defined man as capable of using reason and scientific inquiry to
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the outcome for the Russo Japanese war a concern for the Europeans
    14·1 answer
  • As a ruler of either the eastern or western empire, what kind of advice would you be getting on why you should try to keep the b
    12·1 answer
  • describe a time when you felt disoriented, uncertain, out of place or even fearful when immersed in an unfamiliar culture.
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Describe the establishment of the Tokugawa Shougunate. 2. Who was the first Shogun of this period? 3. What city was the Shogu
    12·1 answer
  • Which statements correctly describe Washington dc check all that apply
    15·1 answer
  • Was the U.S successful in the vietnam war in protecting national interests?
    14·1 answer
  • What are some examples of non-violent social change?
    13·2 answers
  • Mhbsdhsjhdjhddhj.<br><br>B. <br><br>mnxmznxmxnmxn ash jdjd ndjx
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!