HELP MATH STIKES AGAIN!

Lia must work at least 5 hours per week in her family's restaurant for $8 per hour. She also does yard work for $12 per hour. Li

agasfer [191]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

let r= number of hours worked at the restaurant

y=number of work hours in the yard

Maximum number of work per week=r+y ≤ 15

Lia must work at least 5 hours in the restaurant

x ≥ 5

Lia wants to earn at least $120 $8/hr in the restaurant and $12/hr in the yard:

8r + 12y ≥ 120

What is the maximum of hours Lia can work in the restaurant and still make at least 120 hours?

Assume Lia worked all 15 hours in the restaurant

she would earn $8*15hours = $120.

The maximum number of hours she can work in the restaurant is therefore 15 hours

What is the maximum amount of money Lia can earn in a week?

Lia has to work a minimum of 5 hours in the restaurant. She earns more from yard work, so she should devote the rest of her available work hours to yard work.

That means that, given her 15 hour work limit, she will maximize her income by working 5 hours in the restaurant and 10 hours in the yard.

5r+10y

5*8 + 10*12

= 40 + 120

= $160

6 0

2 years ago

An arithmetic sequence has this recursive formula:

horsena [70]

Answer:

$\text{\bf{C.}}\quad a_n=4+(n-1)(-7)$

Step-by-step explanation:

An arithmetic sequence that is described by the explicit formula ...

$a_n=a_1+(n-1)d$

can also be described by the recursive formula ...

$\left \{\begin{array}{l}a_1=\text{(first term)}&a_n=a_{n-1}+d&\end{array}\right.$

Matching parts of the formulas, we see that a1 = 4, d = -7. Putting these values into the explicit formula gives ...

$a_n=4+(n-1)(-7)$

4 0

2 years ago

Zina solves a system of linear equations by elimination and finds a solution of (2, 2). One of the equations is a + b = 4. What

Dima020 [189]

Answer:

Option D

a+3b=8

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Find the inverse Laplace transform f(t) of the function F(s). Write uc for the Heaviside function that turns on at c, not uc(t).

zzz [600]

Answer:

F(t) $=\frac{-1}{2}e^{7(t-7)}+\frac{1}{2}e^{-7(t-7)}$

Step-by-step explanation:

We have given $F(S)=\frac{7e^{-7s}}{s^2-49}$

Now $F(S)=e^{-7s}G(s)$

Here $G(S)=\frac{7}{S^2-49}$

Now first find the Laplace inverse of G(S)

Using partial fraction

$\frac{7}{(s+7)(s-7)}=\frac{A}{(S+7)}+\frac{B}{S-7}$

$7=A(S-7)+B(S+7)$

On comparing the coefficient

$A=\frac{1}{2}$ and $B=\frac{-1}{2}$

On putting the value of A and B

$G(S)=\frac{-1}{2(S+7)}+\frac{1}{2(S+7)}$

Taking inverse Laplace

$G(t)=\frac{-1}{2}e^{7t}+\frac{1}{2}e^{-7t}$

Now in G(s) there is onether term $e^{-7s}$

So F(t) $=\frac{-1}{2}e^{7(t-7)}+\frac{1}{2}e^{-7(t-7)}$

6 0

2 years ago

The nutrition supervisor for a school district is considering adding a baked potato bar to the lunch for all the high school caf

Nimfa-mama [501]

Using the confidence interval, it is found that the correct option is:

There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.

<h3>When does a confidence interval for the difference of proportions gives convincing evidence that there is a difference?</h3>

It gives convincing evidence when 0 is not part of the confidence interval.

In this problem, the interval is (0.02, 0.38), which does not contain 0, hence the correct option is:

There is convincing evidence because the entire interval is above 0.

More can be learned about confidence intervals at brainly.com/question/25890103

3 0

1 year ago