okay, genuinely does anyone know how this work? if you do could you please explain how you get the answer-
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean temperature is different from 42 deg
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information, we are being told that:
The manufacturer of a refrigerator system for beer kegs produces refrigerators that are supposed to maintain a true mean temperature, μ, of 42°F
i. e mean μ = 42
The owner of the brewery does not agree with the refrigerator manufacturer, and claims he can prove that the true mean temperature is incorrect.
Assuming that a hypothesis test of the claim has been conducted and that the conclusion is to reject the null hypothesis, state the conclusion in nontechnical terms.
From above;
The null and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as:
Here , the hypothesis test of the claim is the alternative hypothesis.
The conclusion based on the decision rule: is to reject the null hypothesis
∴
The conclusion in non technical terms is that :
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the mean temperature is different from 42 deg