Answer:
be a loyal citizen. seRioSly,that is all it takes.
Answer: True.
Explanation:
It is considered a major or catastrophic incident to any incident caused in a natural or provoked way, which endangers the population, infrastructure, or natural resources.
When we talk about the <u>elements of the community</u>, we refer to government agencies, such as the police and firefighters. And non-governmental organizations such as churches, social organizations, or private individuals who can offer their help.
When an incident is considered catastrophic, the entire community's response is expected to help during or after the event. For example, when a hurricane strikes an area, the help is needed to evacuate the victims (firefighters and police). Also is required people who provide food to the victims (can help church members/social organizations), and reconstruction assistance (private company, people from the community).
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer: Self-contempt.
Explanation: Self contempt is the behavior shown by a person who is in disgrace or feels worthless towards oneself. This leads to the situation where that person starts to behave in a vile and rude manner towards others and feels completely sad and non-admired.
This is the situation faced by Mr. Suko, he has become harsh towards other people where in reality he is sad and feels worthless according to the Erikson theory.
Answer:
There are many more small organisms than large organisms in the ocean.
Explanation:
According to the 10% rule, there are many more organisms at the first trophic level, and most small organism make up the first trophic level in marine ecosystem. examples are planktons and detritus. They are the primary producers, and the primary consumers are also mostly made up small aquatic animals who feed on planktons. This is an indication that there are more small organisms in the ocean compared to large organisms because the large organisms depends directly on indirectly on the small organisms for survival.
This analysis asserts that Schlafly denounced the amendment because she believed it would attack the rights of housewives, give the federal government excessive power, and hurt women already equal before the law in the ways that mattered.
