<u>Answer:
</u>
In the context of Supreme Court conferences, the statement that is true of a dissenting opinion is that it is expressed by a judge or justice who disagrees with the majority opinion.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- When a case is heard by a bench of multiple justices sitting in odd numbers, there is a possibility that there is a difference of opinion among the judges regarding the decision to be given in the case.
- In such instances, the decision which is given by the majority of judges is deemed to be final, but the judges who do not agree with the decision given have the right to express their dissent in writing.
Answer:
a. The Texas insurance code.
Explanation:
The correct one is proposal 1. In democracy, it is understood that people can convey their thoughts in and to the public. This is one of the aspects democracies boast about. Let's now see why the other proposals are all wrong. Though the proponents of democracy see in each individual the right to express themselves freely and in public, it is well known that people's views aren't always fact-based, but many times come from personal understanding of issues. Individuals' opinions don't carry the same weight. It's the opinions of the majority of the decision makers that count, not that of all people. Lastly, the fourth proposal can't hold true. Basing ourselves on the previous point, if only the voice of the majority speaks, then the minority can't be decisive in an election.
Answer:
Roughly in the middle of the globe.
Explanation:
Right in the red
So I'd say D because. Between the Tropic of Cancer (roughly 23.5-degrees North latitude) and the Tropic of Capricorn (roughly 23.5 degrees-South Latitude).
