The additional number of employees needed is 3.
Total labor hours required per week = 600
Available regular hour per person per week = 40
For 12-person team, the total available regular hour = 40*12 = 480 per week.
Additional regular hours required to fulfill the requirement = 600 - 480 = 120 hours per week.
Additional number of employees needed = Additional regular hours required / Regular hour per person per week
Additional number of employees needed = 120/40
Additional number of employees needed = 3
The missing word is <em>"amazon Labor Information -Regular Rate $15.00/hr -Overtime Rate $22.50/hr -Targeted Labor Cost $9,000/wk -Labor Hours Needed 600/wk -Any hour worked over 40 hrs/wk must be paid overtime rate For a 12-person team, how many additic 3 3 15 50 120 750</em>"
See similar solution here
<em>brainly.com/question/11776482</em>
Answer:
The answer is: Duncan's materials costs per unit was $1.50 ($6.10 - $4.60) less than Davis's materials costs per unit.
Explanation:
We must first calculate the materials costs for both companies:
- Duncan's total costs was $457,250 minus conversion costs of $279,000 equals total materials costs of $178,250.
-
Davis's total costs was $721,056 minus conversion costs of $381,408 equals total materials costs of $339,648
.
Now we calculate the materials costs per unit produced:
- Duncan's total materials costs $178,250 divided by 38,750 units equals $4.60 per unit.
- Davis's total materials costs $339,648 divided by 55,680 units equals $6.10 per unit.
So Duncan's materials costs per unit was $1.50 ($6.10 - $4.60) less than Davis's materials costs per unit.
.
Answer: Proposal C
Explanation:
The way to solve this is to calculate the Present Values of all these payments. The smallest present value is the best.
Proposal A.
Periodic payment of $2,000 makes this an annuity.
Present value of Annuity = Annuity * ( 1 - ( 1 + r ) ^ -n)/r
= 2,000 * (1 - (1 + 0.5%)⁻⁶⁰) / 0.5%
= $103,451.12
Proposal B
Present value = Down payment + present value of annuity
= 10,000 + [2,200 * ( 1 - ( 1 + 0.5%)⁻⁴⁸) / 0.5%]
= 10,000 + 93,676.70
= $103,676.70
Proposal C
Present value = Present value of annuity + Present value of future payment
= [500 * (1 - (1 + 0.5%)⁻³⁶) / 0.5%] + [116,000 / (1 + 0.5%)⁶⁰]
= 16,435.51 + 85,999.17
= $102,434.68
<em>Proposal C has the lowest present value and so is best. </em>
Answer:
If management decides to eliminate this product line, the company’s net income will reduce by $22,000
Explanation:
<em>A product should be shut down if doing so would make the savings in fixed costs associated with the product to exceed the lost contribution. Other wise , the product should remain.</em>
<em>In a shut down decision , the following relevant cash flows should be considered:</em>
- <em>Lost contribution from the product to be shut down</em>
- <em>Savings in fixed directly attributable to the product under consideration.</em>
$
Lost contribution from shut down (100,000)
Savings in fixed cost (60% × 130,000) <u> 78,000</u>
Net loss from shut down <u> (22,000)</u>
Net loss from shut down = $(22,000)
If management decides to eliminate this product line, the company’s net income will reduce by $22,000
Answer:
B. The zero based budget requires managers to re-justify every planned expenditure every year.
Explanation:
A zero based budget is one that does not take into account historical data when it is considering the present year budget. Each departmental requirement is re-evaluated and a new amount is assigned as budget for the year.
However conventional budgets carryover the previous year's expenses as a base data point. This results in similar budgeting across years.
So the main difference between the two is that zero based budget requires managers to re-justify every planned expenditure every year.
