Aggressive driving is the use of a vehicle as a weapon or in a manner to physically assault a driver or their vehicle while on the road way statement is "False"
<u>Answer:</u> Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
The statement is false because it defines road rage rather than aggressive driving. Any single motivational violation demands a defensive reaction of another driver or when more than two or two moving contraventions who are likely to destroy other persons or property then termed as "Aggressive Driving".
The research performed by the United States concluded that the majority of these drivers were poorly educated people with criminal records and very young. Also, carriers of violence and alcohol or drug problems while many of whom had recently suffered emotional or professional problems. Even the number of these drivers were successful individuals with no background of violence, crime or substance abuse.
He discovered Pluto in 1930
Answer:
The market
Explanation:
An institutional arena is a social place where relations are enforced by accepted rules of interaction. Market the institutional arena where labor for pay, economic exchange, and wealth accumulation take place. So when they are sacrificing their job , the market is taking part in the decision making.
<span>they are more prone to significant factors that drive people to crime, such as poverty and racism. Gentrifcation in inner cities thereby creates a place where the original inhabitants of a gentrified area are seen as out of place by society as a whole, thereby leading to the likelihood of black male arrests</span>
Explanation:
As noted, Republicans and Democrats have dominated electoral politics since the 1860s. This unrivaled record of the same two parties continuously controlling a nation’s electoral politics reflects structural aspects of the American political system as well as special features of the parties.
The standard arrangement for electing national and state legislators in the United States is the “single-member” district system, wherein the candidate who receives a plurality of the vote (that is, the greatest number of votes in the given voting district) wins the election. Although a few states require a majority of votes for election, most officeholders can be elected with a simple plurality.
Unlike proportional systems popular in many democracies, the single-member-district arrangement permits only one party to win in any given district. The single-member system thus creates incentives to form broadly based national parties with sufficient management skills, financial resources and popular appeal to win legislative district pluralities all over the country. Under this system, minor and third-party candidates are disadvantaged. Parties with minimal financial resources and popular backing tend not to win any representation at all. Thus, it is hard for new parties to achieve a viable degree of proportional representation, and achieve national clout, due to the “winner-take-all” structure of the U.S. electoral system.
Why two instead of, say, three well-financed national parties? In part because two parties are seen to offer the voters sufficient choice, in part because Americans historically have disliked political extremes, and in part because both parties are open to new ideas (see below).
