Answer:
$ 317,000
Explanation:
Octuber Production: 200,000
Variable Overhead: $ 0.80 per unit
Fixed Overhead: $ 157,000
<u>Factory Overhead Budget for Octobe</u>r:
Octuber Production x Variable Overhead = <em>200,000 x 0.80 = 160,000</em>
Variable Overhead: <em>$ 160,000</em>
+
Fixed Overhead: <em> </em><em><u> $ 157,000</u></em><em> </em>
Total Overhead:<em> </em> <em> </em><em>$ 317,000</em><em> ( $ 160,000 + $ 157,000 ) </em>
This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings. You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.
In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations. However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.
I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in. For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.
There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.
As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic. We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.
These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).
Answer:
1. 7.2
2. 9
Explanation:
take 72 and divide by number of years
72/x= ROI
Answer:
la respuesta correcta es jdjfhf
Answer:
A) decrease MPC, increase MPS, and decrease the multiplier so that changes in planned investment will have a smaller impact on equilibrium output.
Explanation:
When you receive money, e.g. get paid by your employer, the first thing you do is pay for your basic necessities which are classified as autonomous spending. Then hopefully you will have some money left which is classified as disposable income. You can do two things with your disposable income, either spend it or save it.
The proportion that you spend is called the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) and the remaining part that you save is called the marginal propensity to save (MPS). If the MPS was 1% in 2007 and increased to 5% in 2009, then the MPC was 0.99 in 2007 and 0.95 in 2009.
The formula to calculate the economic multiplier is 1 / MPS:
- the economic multiplier in 2007 = 1 / 1% = 100
- the economic multiplier in 2009 = 1 / 5% = 20
