Answer:
The answer is $10,800
Explanation:
Straight line method of depreciation is:
Cost - residual value/number of useful life
Cost - $62,000
Residual value - $8,000
Number of years - 5years
=62,000 - 8,000/5
=57,000/5
$10,800.
Therefore, $10,800 will be charged every year.
Answer:
The answer is B: At the midpoint of the project, members realize that their behavior pattern must change in order to complete the project on time.
Explanation:
Punctuated equilibrium is a concept in both biology and business where long periods of relative stability are often followed by growth spurts.
The punctuated-equilibrium model argues that groups usually move forward during bursts of change after going for long periods without change.
In the answer B, this concept is captured as group members of a project realise somewhere at the midpoint, that their behavior pattern must change in order to complete the project on time.
This shows that a period of relative stability was observed and then a short period of growth will be observed during the project lifecycle. This agrees with the development pattern known as punctuated equilibrium.
Answer:
It belongs to Alma because Susan abandoned it and Alma took possession of it
Explanation:
By common law, Alma is a person who has found an abandoned property and she may claim it. To do this, she has to take some definite steps to show her claim. Alma can claim this abandoned piece of chair by taking it into her house, or by placing a sign on it to show that she now owns it.
If Susan was to take this to court, the court would determine the kind of item and where it was found to determine if Alma has a right to it. But since it was found in a dump site she now has the right to it.
Answer:
a. Asarta Inc. could pay the fishermen $8,500 and keep polluting
Explanation:
The fishermen sell the fish for $8,000 a year at local market.
Due to pollution emitted by company into stream, their catch is dwindling and also their income.
The company benefits from usage of stream to the tune of $4,000 a year. In such scenario, if company compensates the fishermen for any amount between $8,000 and $40,000 then, in that case, optimal solution to the problem can be achieved in absence of any other transaction cost as per the Coase Theorem.
Therefore, The Asarta Inc. could pay the fishermen $8,500 and keep polluting.