The answer choice which shows the Wegman's motivating factor which is an intrinsic motivator is:
- a. A sense of pride from meeting customer needs
<h3>What is a motivating factor? </h3>
This refers to the things which makes a person behave in a certain way with the aim of getting a reward.
<h3>What is Intrinsic Motivation? </h3>
This refers to the pleasures gotten from performing a task or doing a certain action which is for fun, rather for external motivation like money or other rewards.
Therefore, we can see that from Wegman's policy, he was able to get intrinsic motivation from meeting the customer's needs which gave him a sense of pride.
Read more about motivation here:
brainly.com/question/6853726
Answer:
We have the comparison below
Explanation:
1 2 3
Expenses for the year 20000 27000 34000
PVIF at 12% 0.89286 0.79719 0.71178
PV of expenses 17857 21524 24201
Cumulative PV of expenses 17857 39381 63582
EOY MV -1000 -1750 -2500
PV of MV -893 -1395 -1779
Total PW (4000+ PV of expenses - PV of MV) 22750 44776 69361
P/A 0.89286 1.69005 2.40183
EUAC 25480 26494 28879
Answer:
$30,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount received by Janet is given below:
Loss on sale of other assets is
= $150,000 - $50,000
= $100,000
Share of Janet in loss is
= $100,000 × 5 ÷ 10
= $50,000
So,
Janet revised capital balance is
= $80,000 - $50,000
= $30,000
Answer:
It is deducted from the workers
Explanation:
All employers are required to deduct social security and medicare taxes from their employees' paychecks. The deducted amounts are remitted to the government through the social security administration authority.
Therefore, the funds for Social Security and Medicare come from the employees' paycheck. It is the workers who contribute these funds from their income.
Answer:
Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus
Explanation:
The options to this question wasn't provided. Here are the options : Both parties experience surplus, but there is inequity because Steve has a much larger producer surplus. Both parties experience surplus, so the transaction was equitable. Only Steve benefits from the sale. Srivani will not be happy with her purchase.
Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.
Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least amount the seller is willing to sell his good.
While both parties earn a surplus, the producer surplus exceeds the consumer surplus . Therefore, the seller benefited more from the trade than the consumer.
I hope my answer helps you
