Answer:
The North Sea Empire
Explanation:
The Viking presence dwindled until 1066, when the invading Norsemen lost their final battle with the English at Stamford Bridge. The death in the battle of King Harald Hardrada of Norway ended any hope of reviving Cnut's North Sea Empire; it is because of this, rather than the Norman conquest, that 1066 is often taken as the end of the Viking Age. Nineteen days later, the Normans, themselves descended from Norsemen, invaded England and defeated the weakened English army at the Battle of Hastings.
Answer:
Absolute monarchy: Rule by a queen or king. Government of Spain and France and few limits on power.
Parliament: Representative body of English. Limited the power of the monarchy.
Explanation:
The absolutist monarchy is a type of government that has a sovereign individual who assumes all the political and social power of the country. that individual is the king or queen, who despite having people to advise his decisions represents a sovereign and irrevocable power that is passed on to his descendants.
A parliament, on the other hand, is a group of elected citizens, who represent the political body of a country and which has the capacity to limit the power of the monarchy and take away their sovereignty, preventing the country's sovereign from abusing power.
What’s the question, I’m confused. Srry couldn’t answer
Neither side made progress in the war
The executive power has grown thanks to the social perception of international crisis. Additionally, this has caused the three branches of public power to weaken.
The central theme of the text is the transformation that the central executive power of the United States has had, influenced by different factors such as:
- Indochina War
- Watergate case
These events have caused the presidency of the United States to acquire more power to make decisions. One of the important aspects of this transformation is international politics because the influence of the international crisis made the executive branch grow in importance.
This deepened an internal crisis between the balance of powers, because the executive branch acquired more power in foreign affairs and this situation is being projected onto the national scene of the United States.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/17905949
Note: This question is missing because the text is missing.
In the last years presidential primacy, so indispensable to the political order, has turned into presidential supremacy. The constitutional Presidency—as events so apparently disparate as the Indochina War and the Watergate affair showed, has become the imperial Presidency and threatens to be the revolutionary Presidency. . . . The imperial Presidency was essentially the creation of foreign policy. A combination of doctrines and emotions—belief in the permanent and universal crisis, fear of communism, faith in the duty and right of the United States to intervene swiftly in every part of the world—had brought about the unprecedented centralization of decisions. Prolonged war in Vietnam strengthened the tendencies toward both centralization and exclusion. So the imperial Presidency grew at the expense of the constitutional order. Like the cowbird, it hatched its own eggs and pushed the others out of the nest. And, as it overwhelmed the traditional separation of powers in foreign affairs, it began to aspire toward an equivalent centralization of power in the domestic polity.
Learn more in:
