Answer:
(A) Yes, since the test statistic is in the rejection region defined by the critical value, reject the null. The claim is the alternative, so the claim is supported.
Step-by-step explanation:
Null hypothesis: The wait time before a call is answered by a service representative is 3.3 minutes.
Alternate hypothesis: The wait time before a call is answered by a service representative is less than 3.3 minutes.
Test statistic (t) = (sample mean - population mean) ÷ sd/√n
sample mean = 3.24 minutes
population mean = 3.3 minutes
sd = 0.4 minutes
n = 62
degree of freedom = n - 1 = 62 - 1 = 71
significance level = 0.08
t = (3.24 - 3.3) ÷ 0.4/√62 = -0.06 ÷ 005 = -1.2
The test is a one-tailed test. The critical value corresponding to 61 degrees of freedom and 0.08 significance level is 1.654
Conclusion:
Reject the null hypothesis because the test statistic -1.2 is in the rejection region of the critical value 1.654. The claim is contained in the alternative hypothesis, so it is supported.
Answer:
B). SAS similarity.
Step-by-step explanation:
In Δ WVU & ΔCAB,
UV/CA = 17/34 = 1/2
&
VW/AB = 14/28 = 1/2
∵ UV/CA = VW/AB = 1/2
& ∠V = ∠A (Given)
∵ ΔWVU ≅ ΔCAB (by SAS similarity)
Answer:
I simply listed the factors of 24, and tested which ones worked in this equation: P = 2a + 2b.
So the factors listed were:
24 x 1
12 x 2
8 x 3
6 x 4
After testing each one of these, 6 and 4 had worked for me.
P = 2(6) + 2(4)
P = 12 + 8
P = 20
Therefore, the dimensions of this rectangle are 6 and 4.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: Yes, it is a function
Step-by-step explanation:
The two choices hat I think are correct are 9 or 10
