First off, actually including the diagram is required if you intend on getting an answer. Thankfully, someone else has posed this question on another site and actually included the diagram. I will first describe the diagram, and then solve the problem.
And the good news is ....
The triangle in the diagram is impossible.
The diagram I found has Josh, Devon, and Marco standing creating an isosceles triangle with Josh and Devon forming the base. And with the given measurements, the illustrated triangle is impossible since in order for form an isosceles triangle with a base of 16 feet (the distance between Josh and Devon), each leg of the triangle would have to be at least 8 feet long and the specified 5 1/3 feet is way too short. So the actual triangle created by Josh, Devon, and Marco can't be an isosceles triangle. But the triangle created by Marco and points A and B has to be an isosceles triangle since the distance from Marco to both points A and B is 4 feet. Therefore we can prove that the two triangles are NOT similar. And therefore using the constant ratio between similar sides of the triangles can not apply.
Okay. So, to find the percent change, we have to do change/original. In this case, it would be 12/15, because 15 and 27 are apart by 12. 12/15 is 0.8. Multiply that by 100 and you get 80. There was an 80% markup of the chair sold to the antique dealer.
Answer:
93 is your answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
What you want to do is PEMDAS.
<em>3 · 32 + 8 ÷ 2 − (4 + 3)</em>
<em>96 + 8 ÷ 2 - 7</em>
<em>96 + 4 - 7 </em>
<em>100 - 7</em>
93 is your answer.
Answer:
th answer i think is thirty
Step-by-step explanation:
30 + 10 = 40 and it said at most $50
tell me if i'm wrong
171 is rounded to 200 as it is closest to 200 than 100
and 727 is rounded to 700 as it is closest to 700 than 800
when we add 200 and 700 we get the answer 900
The sum of 171 and 727 is:
171 + 727 = 898
and 898 is rounded to 900 as it is closest to 900 than 800.
