1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gayaneshka [121]
3 years ago
5

why was it so important to washington that the military campaign in the northwest territory be successful

History
1 answer:
kifflom [539]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Because the northwest territory must be safe at all for enemy if there's no military the enemy can go around so they can pass through inside.

Explanation:

#CarryonLearning

You might be interested in
Huey Long and Upton Sinclair criticized the New Deal on the grounds
Anastasy [175]
Huey Long and Upton Sinclair criticized the New Deal on the grounds that "<span>(A) it was moving the country too far in the direction of socialism," since the New Deal called for a great deal of government programs. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Which duke of Normandy laid claim to the English throne in A.D. 1066 and launched an invasion to claim it? I will mark as BRAINL
Alborosie

Answer:

C

Explanation:

William the Conqueror led the Norman Conquest in 1066.

4 0
3 years ago
describe how mass industrialization allowed European states to achieve control over much of the globe in the late 19th and early
laiz [17]

This should help you!:)Developments in 19th-century Europe are bounded by two great events. The French Revolution broke out in 1789, and its effects reverberated throughout much of Europe for many decades. World War I began in 1914. Its inception resulted from many trends in European society, culture, and diplomacy during the late 19th century. In between these boundaries—the one opening a new set of trends, the other bringing long-standing tensions to a head—much of modern Europe was defined.

Europe during this 125-year span was both united and deeply divided. A number of basic cultural trends, including new literary styles and the spread of science, ran through the entire continent. European states were increasingly locked in diplomatic interaction, culminating in continentwide alliance systems after 1871. At the same time, this was a century of growing nationalism, in which individual states jealously protected their identities and indeed established more rigorous border controls than ever before. Finally, the European continent was to an extent divided between two zones of differential development. Changes such as the Industrial Revolution and political liberalization spread first and fastest in western Europe—Britain, France, the Low Countries, Scandinavia, and, to an extent, Germany and Italy. Eastern and southern Europe, more rural at the outset of the period, changed more slowly and in somewhat different ways.

Europe witnessed important common patterns and increasing interconnections, but these developments must be assessed in terms of nation-state divisions and, even more, of larger regional differences. Some trends, including the ongoing impact of the French Revolution, ran through virtually the entire 19th century. Other characteristics, however, had a shorter life span.

Some historians prefer to divide 19th-century history into relatively small chunks. Thus, 1789–1815 is defined by the French Revolution and Napoleon; 1815–48 forms a period of reaction and adjustment; 1848–71 is dominated by a new round of revolution and the unifications of the German and Italian nations; and 1871–1914, an age of imperialism, is shaped by new kinds of political debate and the pressures that culminated in war. Overriding these important markers, however, a simpler division can also be useful. Between 1789 and 1849 Europe dealt with the forces of political revolution and the first impact of the Industrial Revolution. Between 1849 and 1914 a fuller industrial society emerged, including new forms of states and of diplomatic and military alignments. The mid-19th century, in either formulation, looms as a particularly important point of transition within the extended 19th century.

<span>The Industrial Revolution</span> Britannica Stories <span><span> <span> In The News / Health & Medicine Pollution Responsible for One in Four Deaths of Small Children </span> </span><span> <span> Demystified / Science Is Climate Change Real? </span> </span><span> <span> Spotlight / History The Legacy of Order 9066 and Japanese American Internment </span> </span><span> <span> In The News / Health & Medicine Sickle Cell Disease Reversed with Gene Therapy </span> </span></span> Economic effects

Undergirding the development of modern Europe between the 1780s and 1849 was an unprecedented economic transformation that embraced the first stages of the great Industrial Revolution and a still more general expansion of commercial activity. Articulate Europeans were initially more impressed by the screaming political news generated by the French Revolution and ensuing Napoleonic Wars, but in retrospect the economic upheaval, which related in any event to political and diplomatic trends, has proved more fundamental.

Major economic change was spurred by western Europe’s tremendous population growth during the late 18th century, extending well into the 19th century itself. Between 1750 and 1800, the populations of major countries increased between 50 and 100 percent, chiefly as a result of the use of new food crops (such as the potato) and a temporary decline in epidemic disease. Population growth of this magnitude compelled change. Peasant and artisanal children found their paths to inheritance blocked by sheer numbers and thus had to seek new forms of paying labour. Families of businessmen and landlords also had to innovate to take care of unexpectedly large surviving broods. These pressures occurred in a society already attuned to market transactions, possessed of an active merchant class, and blessed with considerable capital and access to overseas markets as a result of existing dominance in world trade.


3 0
3 years ago
Need help with these, thanks.
denis-greek [22]
The Boston tea party was a protest and an action of the colonies for displaying their rebellious spirit. Therefore, king George must have felt conflictThe Boston tea party’s purpose was to display the rebellious spirit of the colonies. Therefore, king George must have felt conflicted
4 0
4 years ago
The twelve tables were the first written collection of roma?
lyudmila [28]

The Twelve Tables (aka Law of the Twelve Tables) was a set of laws inscribed on 12 bronze tablets created in ancient Rome in 451 and 450 BCE. They were the beginning of a new approach to laws where they would be passed by government and written down so that all citizens might be treated equally before them.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who can vote in an open primary?
    10·2 answers
  • What major events happened in the war of 1812
    9·1 answer
  • How did the production of goods such as clothing and furniture change
    8·2 answers
  • Did Marco polo had a physical features on his journey?
    9·1 answer
  • What are Stenos 3 principles
    15·2 answers
  • Please help thank you
    13·1 answer
  • What three countries or empires made up the world war i alliance of the central powers? germany, or the prussian empire u.s. aus
    5·2 answers
  • Identify the expression equivalent to 4(x + x + 7) − 2x + 8 − 4 by substituting x = 1 and x = 2. A. 6x + 11 B. 3(x + 7) C. 2(3x
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best contrasts England's Glorious Revolution with the French Revolution?
    15·1 answer
  • The 7 Basic Principles is most important to the Constitution and why
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!