Answer:
Our answer is E 114,420
Explanation:
Production budget:
Jan Feb Mar
Budgeted sales units 40000 37000 34000
Add: Ending inventory 12950 11900
Total requirement 52950 48900
Less: Beginning inventory 14000 12950
Budgeted production units 38950 35950
Purchase budget of Box:
Jan Feb
Budgeted production 38950 35950
Bx required per unit 3 3
Total requirement of Boxes 116850 107850
Add: Ending inventory 21570
Total boxes needed 138420
Less: Beginning inventory 24000
Budgeted Purchase boxes 114420
Answer is E. 114420
Answer:
The Carolina Christmas Tree Corporation’s total revenue is $32,500.
Explanation:
The total supply of Carolina Christmas Tree Corporation (Q) = 500
The selling price of a tree (P) = $65
The total revenue (TR)of Carolina Christmas Tree Corporation = Total supply (Q) * Selling price of a tree (P)
TR = 500 * $65 = $ 32500
Therefore, the answer to the given question is option C = $ 32,500
Answer:
c. debit to Bad Debts Expense for $6,900.
Explanation:
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $1,100 credit balance,
Estimated Un collectibles $8000 credit
Required Adjustment $ 6900 credit
The adjustment to record bad debts for the period will require a
c. debit to Bad Debts Expense for $6,900.
Bad Debt Expense $ 6900 Dr
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $ 6900 Cr
Alternatively if the allowance account had a debit balance the entry would have been posted adding the two amounts.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": They were excited about the video conference system.
Explanation:
In order to make sentences more professional and direct, they must be objective. It implies any point of view, perspective, comment, or any subjective piece of information should be deleted so the statement is unbiased. By doing this, we avoid exaggerations or misunderstandings from the author.
In the sentence:
- <em>They were </em><u><em>totally</em></u><em> excited to be getting a new system.
</em>
We should delete "totally" which is an individual perception of the author. Then:
- <em>They were excited about the video conference system.</em>
<em />
Will be a more objective sentence.
Answer:
In every form of analysis, it is always safer to take a macro or holistic view of the situation. This is true for the investment performance of a manager. One investment decision that went right does not suffice to classify an investment portfolio manager as proficient, neither is one that went south enough to tag him deficient.
The forecasting ability of managers, on the balance of probability, will vary for different cases, with a helicopter view of providing a more accurate measure of their performance.
However, if it was possible to analyse the market for volatility and adjust our forecasts it becomes unnecessary to look at and analyse all the information from a 12-month cycle before coming to terms about the performance of the manager.
Cheers!
