Answer:
There is no short answer.
Explanation:
We are given an article that presents a study that suggests adults who played varsity sports in high school have a 20% higher chance of earning a bachelor's degree in college than the ones who did not play during high school.
The outcome variable in this example, which is also the same as a dependent variable, is the chance of graduating from college with a bachelor's degree, which depends on whether that person played varsity sports during their high school years or not.
The treatment variable in this example, which is also the same as an independent variable, is whether the subject played varsity sports in high school or not which affects their chances of graduating from college with a bachelor's degree.
Counterfactual means thinking about an event in a way that did not actually happen, counter to the facts and it helps people feel more in control which in turn provides a psychological soothing effect. Counterfactual scenario in the given example for high school athletes would be not being able to earn a bachelor's degree despite having played sports in high school.
Thinking about the counterfactual scenario is important because it helps people get a sense of power and a feeling of control which is a primal instinct the brain needs to feel safe.
I hope this answer helps.
Answer:
The annual financial disadvantage is $62,560
Explanation:
<u>Analysis of the Costs of Producing Internally and Buying from External Supplier.</u>
Producing Internally External Supplier
Direct materials $3.50 $0
Direct labor $8.10 $0
Variable manufacturing overhead $8.60 $0
Supervisor's salary $4.00 $0
Depreciation of special equipment $2.40 $0
Allocated general overhead $7.60 $7.60
Extra contribution $0 ($2.19)
Purchases Cost $0 $32.70
Product Cost $34.20 $38.11
<u>Conclusion :</u>
We can see that the Product Cost to produce the part internally costs $3.91 less than the cost to purchase from external supplier. Therefore Sewtfi861 Corp has a disadvantage.
Annual disadvantage = 16,000 units × $3.91
= $62,560
Electronic communications tend to be more casual
Answer:
I just asked a question i'll give you brainliest if you can answer it correctly.
Explanation:
Answer:
False
Explanation:
There are 3 main decision making styles that most of us have regarding our normal day to day activities that includes our work and our personal lives, e.g. families and individual decisions. They are consumer, business, and personal decision making styles.
But managers, and specially true leaders have it a little more complicated. The four main decision making styles that apply to leaders are:
- directive: type of autocratic leadership where the leader decides everything by himself/herself
- conceptual: look for different alternatives and analyze each one of them
- consultative: seek advice from colleagues and subordinates, but the leader makes the decision
- consensus: seek advice from others and decisions are made by the group
The second part of the question is true; this leadership styles vary across countries, occupations and job levels.
