1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
CaHeK987 [17]
3 years ago
5

Take a look at these major themes of world history. Which best categorizes “racial and ethnic constructions”?

History
1 answer:
Doss [256]3 years ago
5 0
I believe it is 2. Or 4.
You might be interested in
What is the role of the EPA?
NNADVOKAT [17]
To ensure that Federal regulations are fallowed regarding environmental standards<span />
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is the term to describe the process of becoming a citizen of the United States?
sukhopar [10]

Naturalization is the term to describe the process of becoming a citizen of the United States.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What major event in the pacific theatre during the world war 2 were major turning points for the allied force
Vilka [71]
This is your answer it may be long.Japanese expansion in East Asia began in 1931 with the invasion of Manchuria and continued in 1937 with a brutal attack on China. On September 27, 1940, Japan signed the Tripartite Pact with Germany and Italy, thus entering the military alliance known as the "Axis<span>." Seeking to curb Japanese aggression and force a withdrawal of Japanese forces from Manchuria and China, the United States imposed economic sanctions on Japan. Faced with severe shortages of oil and other natural resources and driven by the ambition to displace the United States as the dominant Pacific power, Japan decided to attack the United States and British forces in Asia and seize the resources of Southeast Asia.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
What was one way new territories tried to get more settlers
Anna11 [10]
The answer is b hope I helped
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which claim is not defensible?
Lostsunrise [7]
<span>"The world would be better off if political boundaries didn't exist" is an indefensible claim. The others can be proven or at least debated over because at some point in time all of them have true and false. For instance, the majority of congress and the President have been from the same political party. Also, the majority of congress and the President have NOT been from the same political party. Therefore, you can compare the difference between true and false. Political boundaries have always existed. As a result, you cannot comfortably compare it to anything else.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help me !!
    13·1 answer
  • Which best describes the origins of Hinduism...
    7·2 answers
  • Which territory did Great Britain gain as a result of the opium war
    10·1 answer
  • Northwest Ordinance of 1787, Congress set aside land for the support of ?
    14·2 answers
  • Which news headline best assesses the impact of the hundred years war on medieval europe?
    11·1 answer
  • How many cars were on the road in 1930?
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Hitler grand plan fail?
    13·1 answer
  • ¿Quien es la Virgen Maria?
    15·1 answer
  • How many Supreme Court justices does the US Congress allow?
    11·1 answer
  • Who was the first Muslim president of Indian national congress​
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!