The computed value must closely match the real value for a model to be considered valid. If the percentage of pleased or very satisfied students remains close to 75% after Mateo surveys additional students, Mateo's model is still viable. The model is faulty if the opposite is true.
<h3>How will mateo know whether his model is valid or not?</h3>
In general, a valid model is one whose estimated value is close to the real value. This kind of model is considered to be accurate. It must be somewhat near to the real value if it doesn't resemble the real value.
If the findings of the survey are sufficiently similar to one another, then the model may be considered valid.
P1 equals 75%, which is the real assessment of the number of happy pupils
P2 is 70 percent; this represents the second assessment of happy pupils
In conclusion, The estimated value of a model has to be somewhat close to the real value for the model to be considered valid. If the number of students who are either pleased or extremely satisfied remains close to 75 percent following Mateo's survey of more students, then Mateo's model is likely accurate. In any other scenario, the model cannot be trusted.
Read more about probability
brainly.com/question/795909
#SPJ1
The answer to the question
Answer:
(-∞,∞)
Step-by-step explanation:
I think 2,057.21 because 18,541.89 divided by 9 is 2,057.21
Sue's total pay of year will have three parts
1) Fixed Salary for 12 months
one month salary = £1410
so 12 month salary = £1410 x 12 = £16920
2) 26% of total profit
Total cost to the company- £473,500
Total income for the company - £549,000
Profit = Total income for the company - Total cost to the company
= £549,000 - £473,500 = £75500
Sues income from profit = 26% of £75500 = (26 × 75500)/100 = £19630
3) Bonus if Sue sells at least 16 cars
Given number of months when sue solds atleast 16 cars = 4
So bonus income = 4 × 390 = £1560
Adding the three above parts
Sue's total pay for the year = £16920 + £19630 + £1560 = £38110
