Technically, an animal can get carbon from any of these.
Carbon is present in all living things so if a shark ate a fish, they ate carbon. If a bear ate salmon, they ate carbon. If a cow ate grass, they ate carbon. As for the antelope, carbon dioxide has been found to be present in water as a dissolved gas.
If I were you I would probably go with the antelope though.
Answer:
<em>No, these exceptions do not discredit natural selection.</em>
Explanation:
Natural selection tends to favour those organisms which are better adapted to live in an environment. But it does not completely remove the other organisms from the world that are less adapted to live in an environment. Usually, the number of these organisms that are not favoured by natural selection is very less as compared to the number of organisms which are favoured by natural selection. As we see, the number of albino animals is far lesser as compared to their wild-type animals.
Habitat isolation is likely to be most relevant in the case of trumpeters in the Amazon basin.
If trumpeters can not cross rivers, then they would be able to mate with trumpeters on the same side of the river but not on the other side- a form of prezygotic isolation.
what are trumpeters?
The term "trumpeter" comes from the deep, booming territorial call of these chicken-sized, long-necked, hunch-backed, small-headed, short-tailed, dark-plumed, long-legged birds that wander the jungle floors of South America.The land of South America that now the Amazon River and its tributaries drain is recognized as the Amazon basin.
learn more about Amazon basin here:-
brainly.com/question/14229038
#SPJ4
Go over materials that where gaven to you and maybe ask your teachers about the subject on the test but just come prepared and be ready for all that you learn about
