The bubonic plaque changed the social structure of Europe by this:
Before, the nobles and aristocrats were the 'body' that ran almost everything political. However, after the bubonic plague, this was shifted towards the common people. So the common people basically got more rights.
hope this helps :D
Answer:
The correct answer is to benefit colonial peoples
Explanation:
To benefit colonial is the right answer because Kipling was someone who proclaimed the idea that European colonial powers are taking on their back the obligation to illuminate Native people of the colonies. They are actually sacrificing according to Kipling, so they could help them evolve.
That is why other options are false.
Europeans have no benefit. They are "helping."
Antifederalist saw the Constitution as a way for the Federalist to gain more control over the states. This was seen as the opposite for the Federalist Party because they just wanted to create a central government that was strong enough to run the whole country. The Antifederalist Party was totally against the ratification because they were afraid that the national government would become too powerful and take advantage of their power. The Federalist Party was for the Constitution because they saw it as a way for the people to get more involved in the government since the most powerful branch would be directly linked to the people. Lastly, the Antifederalists saw the Constitution as a way to take the power of the states away while the Federalists interpreted the Constitution as a way for the states and the national government to have similar powers that still allow the national government to handle national affairs rather than having the states do it.
Poor people are left in central cities & m<span>ore cars are needed.</span>
Lincoln's<span> blueprint for </span>Reconstruction<span> included the Ten-Percent </span>Plan, which specified that a southern state could be readmitted into the Union once 10 percent of its voters <span>swore an oath of allegiance to the Union.</span>