Answer:
The claim made by the researcher lacks the validity on basis of reasons as indicated in the explanation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim made by the researcher is not valid on basis of following reasons:
- Interacting variables are not mapped accurately. The additional variables as the health status of the volunteers, eating and fitness habits are not considered in the consideration. This results in a in complete validation.
- The placebo effect is not catered accordingly. As the half of the volunteers are taking nothing, this is not the direct influence of the placebo and thus double-blinded testing for placebo effect is to be ensured in future experiments.
- The environmental effects are not considered as the effect under study is dependent on the environmental effects, thus the claim is biased and the generalization is not valid.
More than likely it is c, because I looked over all the answers and c was the best one for the problem
9514 1404 393
Answer:
$105
Step-by-step explanation:
The thicker wall takes 345 -205 = 140 more blocks. Each of those costs $0.75, so the added blocks will cost ...
140 × $0.75 = $105
The thicker wall will cost $105 more.
Answer: I got -2
I plugged -6 in for y and then simplified. -6 x -6 = 36. 7 x -6 = -42. So 36 - 42 = -6. -6 + 4 = -2
Answer:
very easy A graph shows the horizontal axis numbered 2 to 8 and the vertical axis numbered 10 to 50. A line increases from 0 to 4 then decreases from 4 to 9.
Which type of function best models the data shown on the scatterplot?
Step-by-step explanation:
