I do not think that Shakespeare sees evil as stronger than good or human
understanding because in the end, Scotland is returned to her rightful
king and Malcolm is an element of good in the play. Macbeth certainly
is taken over by his greed and ambition, and a sense of evil gets the
better of him and clouds his good judgment. However, evil overall does
not reign supreme, and the audience sees the harm that evil has caused
to Macbeth throughout the play. He has lost his wife, the loyalty of
his subjects, and his integrity. Macbeth knows that he should grow old
in the company of friends, but he acknowledges that he is now alone. So
evil does not overcome good in the end--evil leaves Scotland with the
beheading of Macbeth.
- hope this helps
The sentences that indicate that it is an ex nihilo type of creation story are the following sentences:
<em>" There was as yet no man, nor any animal, nor bird, nor fish, nor crawfish, nor any pit, nor ravine, nor green herb, nor any tree; nothing was but the firmament. The face of the earth had not yet appeared—only the peaceful sea and all the space of heaven. There was nothing yet joined together, nothing that clung to anything else; nothing that balanced itself, that made the least rustling, that made a sound in the heaven. There was nothing that stood up; "</em>
Explanation:
This creation story in the passage called "ex nihilo earth diver world parents emergence", it can be summarized as the creation made out nothing. It is known that the creation story is a religious, cultural and traditional issue or story in which it is also known as cosmogony that is related to the origins of our world.
A megalopolis is B. a series of almost continuous metropolitan centers with urban functions that exchange flows of people and goods with the surrounding areas and the rest of the world. An example is the Tokkaido Megalopolis in Japan.
I was supposed to do my work for a few classes like French and I didn’t and my inspiration was I didn’t want bad grades
Answer:
President Truman made the decision to use the first atomic bomb, in spite of protests.
Explanation:
The writer of this argument claims that the decision to use an atomic bomb was President Truman's, and he made it in the midst of protest from those around him.
