Answer: 1st to make a good business you have to start off small. For starters start doing a Lemonade Stand. If people like your Lemonade i'm sure they'll promote you by telling there friends. Then your business will get bigger and bigger until you have like a whole company.
Answer:
Effect on income= $400 increase
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Product A Product B Total
Revenue $ 9,400
Variable cost (9,800)
Fixed cost (allocated) (2,100)
Operating income (loss) $(2,500)
Effect on income= operating income - fixed costs
Effect on income= -2,500 + 2,500= 400 increase
Answer:
The best way for the producer of Bubbles to differentiate itself from the foreign multinational is to create a specific market focus or niches for itself.
Explanation:
By creating a dedicated and specific market niche, the producer of bubbles have a specific target market out of the whole market whom they can influence consequently differentiating themselves from the multinationals.
The common arguments that are in favor of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are:
Public image of the company.
Moral Justification.
Public Support for business.
Long run survival of the organization and the public both.
Common arguments that go against CSR are:
Ambiguity in business policies.
Moral Responsibility.
Shareholders' rights
Explanation:
Against
The public should perceive the company as their savior and not their enemy. CSR helps a company stay in the good books of the public. If a cigarette manufacturing company opens a profit free farm or a recreational park for the public, it will ensure the maintenance of a positive image.
Morally, when a company takes something from the public e.g their clean air, or clean environment, then morally the company is bound to give something in return e.g a water filtration plant.
CSR can lead the public to support the company during times of need. A company during tough times might get several volunteers if it is known to have given much to the public.
Co-dependence is essential for the survival of both the organization and the public. Companies excel if the public likes them. If a company has been known to have only take and never give, then the balance is disturbed.
Against:
Not every company has the resources or interest to focus on one problem. Therefore, ambiguous policies of different organizations lead to partial working on one social issue or environmental issue. it leads the problem to be partially solved and not completely eliminated.
Company might morally owe the public in some domain but might not have the resources to fix that particular problem. It may leave the company in a moral debt. In order to compensate, a company may go beyond its capabilities which will not result in mutual benefit. Only one party will be happy.
CSR activities require resources. A company has several stakeholders and all might nit agree to spending/donating their profits for CSR activities. This may sound 'selfish' but public doesn't always know what the stakeholders are going through. CSR in such a case may deprive a stakeholder from a fraction of his share of profit.
<em></em>Your answer is :<em>
B.</em>
The Hepburn Act.
