Answer:
a. Marbury v. Madison
Explanation:
The Marbury case v. Madison was responsible for allowing a court decision through a court. This case gave a lot of influence to the judiciary that was able to make judicial reviews through the courts, being able, then, to remove federal laws that do not correspond to the constitution and allowing the judges to reverse decisions previously taken, but that can no longer be considered.
I'm sorry could you try explaining that a little more clearly?
<u>Answer:</u>
Now and then depicted as a false analogy or a faulty analogy, the week analogy presents a defense by depending too vigorously on superfluous similitudes without recognizing that <em>two ideas, things, or circumstances might be very particular from each other in an increasingly applicable manner. </em>
False Dilemma is a fallacy <em>dependent on an either-or sort of contention.</em>
Two decisions are exhibited, when more may exist, and the case is made that one is false and one is valid or one is worthy and the other isn't. <em>A False analogy is an informal fallacy.</em>
Well, I believe it to be true. As dirt roads, when they are wet tend to be harder to traverse. It largely depends on the context of the question, however
first a glass of water is boiled in a kettle or teapot. when the water is still boiling, half a glass of milk is poured into the boiling water. 2 tablespoons of tea powder is added into the boiling content and finally, tea is stirred and served hot.
hope it helped...!
