1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
postnew [5]
3 years ago
10

During the cold war, the policy that discouraged attack by threatening nuclear war was what?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Leona [35]3 years ago
3 0
During the Cold War, the policy that helped to discourage conflict by threatening nuclear war is called nuclear deterrence or mutually assured destruction. 
You might be interested in
Carly asked her mom for a drink of soda. this time, her mother said ""no,"" although previously she had said ""yes"" many times
Kaylis [27]
The correct answer is the Extinction behavior.

In psychology, extinction is seen in both operantly adapted and conditioned molded conduct. At the point when operant conduct that has been beforehand fortified never again delivers fortifying results the conduct bit by bit quits happening. In classical conditioning, when an adapted jolt is displayed alone, with the goal that it never again predicts the happening to the unconditioned boost, molded reacting bit by bit stops.
8 0
2 years ago
Can you help me with my work I am trying my best but I just get bad grades ​
tino4ka555 [31]

I dont Know what you mean by Help you but I would just say Focus better on school, Hide yourself in a quiet room and Write notes, screenshot the topic, study what you learnt till you understand and do

5 0
3 years ago
Write about the Pros of Indian Judiciary system (for a debate)? (urgent pls)
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

The collegium system must not see itself as being above the safeguards and measures for transparency, accountability and demographic representation that apply to India’s pillars of democracy.

In September 2019, Chief Justice of Madras High Court Vijaya Kamlesh Tahilramani resigned after the collegium upheld their decision to transfer her to the high court of Meghalaya (one of the smallest in the country). Justice Tahilramani was the senior-most high-court judge in the country. The members of the bar associations across Tamil Nadu protested against this move and carried “a one-day court boycott.” In addition, in Maharashtra's Latur, about 2,000 lawyers boycotted court proceedings to protest the transfer. The collegium responded by saying that they have “cogent reasons” for the transfer, and will reveal them if required.

At the heart of this controversy is the functioning of the collegium system, which makes decisions about appointments and transfers in the higher judiciary. In February 2020, former Supreme Court judge and member of the collegium from 2018–2019, Arjan Kumar Sikri, said that far from a “scientific study” about candidates, “most times, we [the collegium] go by “our impression” when appointing judges [to high courts and the Supreme Court].”

The collegium system is headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court. India’s Constitution originally stipulated that the judges of the Supreme Court and high courts would be appointed by the President based on a process of “consultation” with senior judges. The present collegium system emerged later based on three key rulings. In 1981, the “First Judges Case” ruled that the process of consultation with the CJI and other judges did not require a consensus about recommendations. Essentially, the ruling gave the central government “primacy in judicial appointments.” In 1993, the “Second Judges Case” overturned this decision and introduced the collegium system, arguing that “consultation” required “concurrence.” Specifically, the ruling said that the process of appointing judges would be based on “an institutional opinion formed in consultation with the two senior-most judges in the Supreme Court” and the CJI. In 1998, the “Third Judges Case” ruled that the collegium would be a five-member body, establishing the system that is most similar to the one currently being followed.

This reading list details how the current system can be reformed.

Opaque and Unaccountable System

C Raj Kumar writes that the lack of information about the appointment of judges, including the criteria based on which the judges make their choice, is “the most persuasive criticism of the collegium system.”

   Without a transparent process of the appointment of judges, the collegium system will not have the credibility and the legitimacy for it to be accepted by all stakeholders within the legal system. Transparency will not be established merely by stating that the members of the collegium will act in a transparent manner. It will have to be demonstrated by the process that the judiciary adopts in the selection of judges.

The lack of transparency and the absence of formal criteria have multiple worrying implications. Presently, there is no structured process to investigate if a judge who is recommended by the collegium has any conflict of interests. This is important in the context where the

   … collegium has been fraught with serious allegations of different types of alleged conflict of interest among the members of the collegium and the individuals they have selected to become judges of the High Courts and the Supreme Court. There is an urgent need for the collegium to formulate a detailed set of rules and regulations that will govern the determination of conflict of interest among the members of the collegium who are involved in the selection of judges.

Social Background of Judges  

Alok Prasanna Kumar identifies that the collegium system prefers practising lawyers rather than appointing and promoting “judges of the subordinate judiciary,” which often comprises a diverse pool of candidates.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Whose viewpoint does this excerpt reflect? A. the viewpoint of those who supported the Constitution B.the viewpoint of those who
Alexandra [31]

Answer: The answer is A. The point of viewpointof those who supported the Constitution

Explanation: Took the Edg2020 test

8 0
3 years ago
What did both the Jamestown and Plymouth have in common
I am Lyosha [343]
They were both settled by English settlers
they were both horrible locations for planting
many people died in both places the first winter
they both had no idea about Indians
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Individuals play what level of role in the economy?
    14·2 answers
  • Eric has just completed high school and is doing his internship. He is living at home and attends graduate school. He makes dece
    15·1 answer
  • True or false: according to a survey, 34% of respondents agreed that u.s. clothing and shoes are of better quality than foreign
    12·1 answer
  • The most helpful information in the investigation of a crime is often the _______ hours leading up to the crime itself.
    11·1 answer
  • If your mom have you and she's Muslim and your dad have you when he's Christian what do it make you
    15·2 answers
  • Anxiety only occurs in those who have an anxiety disorder. Please select the best answer from the choices provided.
    8·1 answer
  • What is society write in a sentence​
    15·2 answers
  • Are there limitations on mapmakers today?
    14·2 answers
  • The Constitution and the Bill of Rights
    11·1 answer
  • Como crees que será el transporte público en 20 años
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!