Naval supplies were obtained from the Hessians.
Answer:
The Eurasia culture (4000 and 3000 BC) is the first evidences of warfare on horseback.
Explanation:
Throughout the Ancient Near East, there was improved harness and chariot designs in 1600 BC. These were made made for chariot warfare.
An illustration of Sumerian shows that around 2500 BC there were some type of equine pulling wagons.
There were training manual written for war on horses which was a guide for training chariot horses written. This was earlier written about 1350 BC.
There was improved effectiveness of horses in battle which were due to improvements and inventions in technology. These included the invention of the saddle, the stirrup, and later, the horse collar.
Sometime between 30 and 33 A.D
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. The tactic that Charles Townshend use to increase British control of the American colonies would be that created new taxes on the American colonists to raise revenue. Hope this answers the question.
Answer:
Explanation:
Essay Segment or Quote Rubric Rating Comments
Briefly describe ONE major difference between Nash’s and Maier’s historical interpretations of the origins of the American Revolution.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Nash’s argument.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Maier’s argument.
3
2
1
The response to (a) did not earn a point because it is does not adequately describe the arguments of Nash and Maier. It merely lists the idea that Maier believed the Revolution emerged from old ideas, and Nash believed the Revolution was based on new ideas.
The response to (b) earned 1 point by providing evidence that the Boston Tea Party was a specific event that demonstrated the colonists’ rebellion against Great Britain’s taxation, which supports Nash’s argument. The response to
(c) did not earn a point because the Boston Massacre does not support Maier’s argument that the Revolution originated from earlier revolutionary thought.
