1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naddik [55]
3 years ago
11

Could a government have power but no authority? Why or why not? ASAP!!

History
1 answer:
slega [8]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

In political science, legitimacy is the right and acceptance of an authority, usually a governing law or a regime. Whereas authority denotes a specific position in an established government, the term legitimacy denotes a system of government—wherein government denotes "sphere of influence".

Explanation:

please mark me as brainliest thank you

You might be interested in
Do you think the columbian exchange had a more profound effect on the old or new world
son4ous [18]
Defintley old bro it lit dat way Sway ayron

7 0
3 years ago
Which one of these was not a part of the Middle Colonies: Connecticut, Delaware, New York?
stepan [7]
Connecticut was not part of the Middle Colonies. 
7 0
3 years ago
ANOTHER HISTORY QUESTION PLEASE!! <3
pogonyaev

"Federalist No. 47 is the forty-seventh paper from The Federalist Papers. It was published on January 30, 1788 under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist Papers were published. James Madison was its actual author. This paper examines the separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government under the proposed United States Constitution due to the confusion of the concept at the citizen level. It is titled "The Particular Structure of the New Government and the Distribution of Power Among Its Different Parts"." - Wikipedia

I hope that this helps bb <3 :D

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following would reflect the U.S. postion on world affairs in the 1800s?
jok3333 [9.3K]
<span>The answer is U.S. teetering on isolationism and only being involved in world affairs if it directly affects the U.S
 In 1800's U.S. practiced isolationism under that policy never involved in world affairs and only took any action if anything directly affected U.S. U.S wanted to keep the chances of war as low as possible as it was developing as a nation at that time.The non interventionist America, devoted to solving its own problems and developing its own civilization.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What 1966 supreme court case strengthened the rights of accused persons?
kompoz [17]
The miranda rights act / case
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The act of canceling a law?
    13·1 answer
  • William Henry Harrison became famous in America for __________.
    10·1 answer
  • Who was the real winner (Spain or Portugal), and WHY, with the Line of Demarcation? (12 pts)
    10·1 answer
  • What outcome below can you speculate did not occur as a result of these actions ​
    8·1 answer
  • The battle in which more Americans fell than in all the previous wars the United States had fought was
    10·2 answers
  • North africa was invaded, taken and plundered in the 430s by
    8·1 answer
  • Which region of the United States contains the Great Lakes?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following was NOT a reason why Portugal became home to many great explorers?
    7·1 answer
  • ....................
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Americans use local geography to their advantage in the Battle of Bunker Hill?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!