Answer:
How the Articles of Confederation were set up caused the central government to haveslight authority that could not really be enforced. The states had agreed to "worktogether" but were not truly unified. The Articles had given too much power to the statestherefore setting up a truly weak, centralized government. Shay's rebellion highlightedweaknesses within the papers themselves. For example, the central government had nofunds, as they had no authority to tax the people. This meant that there was no fundedmilitary to help stop the rebellion. It was up to the state of Massachusetts to fund theirown militia to put a stop to Shay's Rebellion. At the same time, this meant that the statestruly could get away with almost anything they wanted to do. If the central government did not have the resources to go after them, why would the States feel obligated to adhere to national policies? The clear flaws of the Articles brought a divide between the people
Explanation:
<span>Who applied assembly-line techniques to home construction in the 1950s?
</span>
-William Levitt
The American way of life is the biggest threat to the American way of life.
We act as if we believe that we own and run the world. Careless, wasteful, more than a little bit cocky and self-centered — these traits have defined Americans and our way of life for several generations. It is time for us to become more thoughtful, careful stewards of our natural resources, and more respectful of those other nations with whom we share the earth. If we fail to adjust our attitude, it will become literally impossible for future Americans to enjoy anything like the lifestyle the baby boomers, their parents, and subsequent generations have enjoyed.
The Second Industrial Revolution affected all four regions with several
new changes such as the population, transportation, and economically.
The swift development and progression of the manufacturing economy in
each region was used to construct a need for the workers to entice,
which means to attract or tempt by offering pleasure or advantage, many
of the immigrants.All four regions also have their own type of economy. The Northeast
region stayed being the leading industrial region. Both the South and
the West maintained a developing agricultural economy. However, the
West’s meager population did not really provision much towards the
industrial development. The last region, the Midwest, mainly experienced
economic development in both manufacturing and farming.
If I had to decide on which region to live, that was during the time
frame of the Second Industrial Revolution, would have to be the
Northeast region. My first reason why I would choose the Northeast
region compared to the South, West, and Midwest is because the Northeast
was the leading industrial region in both the First and Second
Industrial Revolution. Another reason is because I originally was from
the Northeast region, in the state of New York, which back then was one
of the three states that produced more than 85% of all U.S. industrial
products in 1890.
hope it helps
