Answer:
Margin of safety= 950 units
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the break-even point in units:</u>
Break-even point in units= fixed costs/ contribution margin per unit
Break-even point in units= 42,000 / (54 - 14)
Break-even point in units= 1,050
<u>Now, the margin of safety in units:</u>
<u></u>
Margin of safety= (current sales level - break-even point)
Margin of safety= 2,000 - 1,050
Margin of safety= 950 units
The answer choice that is NOT a method of evaluating the risk of a project is its B. Profile
<h3>What is Risk Management?</h3>
This refers to the identification of risk in any venture and the evaluation of the response to risk factors.
Hence, we can see that when a person is evaluating the risk of a project, he would have to check the net present value, the coefficient of variation, etc, but the evaluation of the profile is not a method of risk evaluation of the project.
Read more about risk management here:
brainly.com/question/13760012
#SPJ1
Answer:
Income will increase by $5 per unit
Explanation:
The income effect in case of the order accepted is presented below:
As we know that
Additional sales per unit $32
Direct material per unit $12
Direct labor per unit $9
And, the incremental variable overhead cost is $6 per unit
Since the fixed cost is the same so it does not affect the effect on income
So, the income effect would be
= $32 - $12 - $9 - $6
= $5 per unit
Since the answer comes in positive which means there is an increase in income
Answer:
b. 5.0%
Explanation:
For this question, we use the Capital Asset Pricing model (CAPM) formula that is shown below:
Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)
where,
The Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return) is also known as the market risk premium
So, for stock A, the market risk premium is
10% = 5% + 1.0 × market risk premium
10 - 5% = 1.0 × market risk premium
5% ÷ 1.0 = market risk premium
So, the market risk premium is 5.0%
The basis for this argument is that consumption tax takes a larger percentage of income from low income earners than from high income earners. This is because consumption tax is uniformly applied to all people irrespective of their situation.<span />
