The answer in this question is that the research has shown that women who were exposed to the flu virus during her first trimester of pregnancy had a sevenfold increased risk of bearing a child who later developed schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is defined as a mental disorder by abnormal social behavior and failure to understand what is real.
Answer:
representativeness heuristic
Explanation:
Max, an attorney, is attending a hearing at the federal courthouse. He opens the courthouse door for a young woman with a tattoo on her forearm. When Max enters the room of the hearing, he is stunned to see that the assigned judge is the same woman. Max had applied the representativeness heuristic.
Answer:
Emotion regulation
Explanation:
Emotional Regulation is simply the strategic method used to regulate or control which emotions we should have, when we have them, and how it should occur either strongly/how we should experience and express them. Example is when include doing something nice for the sake of feeling good or better. It also includes trying to increase or decrease positive emotions and also aiming to increase a negative emotion if it has the tendency to be like a good strategy in a particular situation.
Answer:
try russia they are full of drama and history quite interesting
Explanation:
The behaviour described above could be motivated by the so-called altruistic punishment.
The ultimatum game is a two-player game, in which the first player plays the role of the offeror while the second is the respondent. The first one is endowed with a certain amount of money (for example, 100 $) and has to make an offer about how to split it between the two of them. If the respondent accepts the offer, each player would receive the amount of money that had been proposed by the offeror. If the respondent does not accept, both will earn 0.
A respondent will accept any offer that maximizes his utility. If utility meant exactly the same as money earnings, the respondent would accept any offer in which he receives at least 1 $, as he would be left better off than before (when he had 0$). But this is not true, as in many cases the respondent would choose to punish the other player by refusing his offer so that both earn 0$, if he considers the other has done an unfair distribution. This behaviour is known as the altruistic punishment, as although the offeror is punished, he learns a lesson from it.
If the offeror had expected that possibility he would go for more egalitarian distributions, so that he makes sure the respondent does not punish him and both manage to earn some money. This is why in the end many proposers offer half of the money in the game.
