Failure to comply with international norms and the lack of protection of human rights <em>weaken actions to establish, maintain and consolidate peace</em>
Answer:
B: keeping foo safe
Explanation:
I guess i don't <em>need</em> an explanation, right?
Answer:
<em>If you are using Brainly on your iPhone or another iOS device, you have to cancel your subscription on the App Store. </em>
<em>If you are using Brainly on your iPhone or another iOS device, you have to cancel your subscription on the App Store. Here are the steps:</em>
<em>1</em><em>.</em><em>Access the Settings app</em>
<em>2</em><em>.</em><em>Tap your name</em>
<em>3</em><em>.</em><em>Scroll down until you reach the Subscriptions feature</em>
<em>4</em><em>.</em><em>Tap on Subscriptions</em>
<em>5</em><em>.</em><em>Locate your Brainly Plus subscription</em>
<em>6</em><em>.</em><em>Select Cancel Subscription</em>
Answer: Defamation is "the action of damaging the good reputation of someone; slander or libel". Therefore no
Answer:
"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."
Explanation:
