In this question, austin turk and many other conflict criminologists see crime as a natural consequence of inter group struggles over control. although crime is commonly define as an unlawful act of someone and is punishable by the state or other authority. And it is also define as not just an act but as an illegal act.
It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.
There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.
There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:
- no mutation
- random mating
- no gene flow
- infinite population size
- and no selection (natural nor forced).
You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.
For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.
Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.
If you want to learn more, you can read:
brainly.com/question/19431143
Answer:
1. Esophagus or Oesophagus
2. Stomach
3. Small intestines
4. Large intestine and anus.
The solid organs of the digestive system are:
1. liver
2. Pancreas
3. Gall bladder.
A balance of this two process must be maintained in order to attain a constant earth temperature.
<h3>
Energy flow in the earth</h3>
The earth in itself is a massive ecosystem. Energy flows into the earth and out of it. The only source of energy input to the earth is the sun. Also, energy is lost from the earth via re-radiation of energy in the form of infrared rays.
However, this inflow and out flow of energy affects the temperature of the earth. A balance of this two process must be maintained in order to attain a constant earth temperature.
Learn more about ecosystem: brainly.com/question/1673533
