We cannot agree with Danika. Why? Well, The reasoning is given as follows:
Two functions are inverses of each other if and only if it is true that the composition function is given by:
Everything is ok up to this point, right?. But let's prove that this is not fulfilled for these functions, then:
<span>
As you can see we did not obtain the function that matches the definition of </span>inverse functions. For that reason <em>we can't agree with Danika</em>.
Two functions are inverses of each other if and only if it is true that the composition function is given by:
Everything is ok up to this point, right?. But let's prove that this is not fulfilled for these functions, then:
<span>
As you can see we did not obtain the function that matches the definition of </span>inverse functions. For that reason <em>we can't agree with Danika</em>.
